- #DIGITAL ARTIFACT MEANING HOW TO#
- #DIGITAL ARTIFACT MEANING SOFTWARE#
- #DIGITAL ARTIFACT MEANING PROFESSIONAL#
For example, the marketing field focuses more on individual implications of digital innovation and how to inform and convince customers (e.g., Belk, 2013 Konya-Baumbach et al., 2019 Lamberton and Stephen, 2016), the IS field has a stronger focus on the role of digital technology itself (e.g., Ciriello et al., 2019 Eaton et al., 2015 Jarvenpaa and Standaert, 2018), and the economics field focuses more on the inter-organizational context of digital innovation in order to deduct policy recommendations (Boons and Stam, 2019 Brunswicker and Schecter, 2019 Pershina et al., 2019). 279), making it difficult to identify overarching themes, findings, and remaining blind spots. Furthermore, because of the cross-disciplinary interest in digital innovation, insights are currently fragmented across multiple fields without "a common vocabulary or generic framework of digital innovation" (Lyytinen et al., 2020, p. There is a need for wide-ranging dialogues with various working life actors when outlining the ways in which future work will be carried out and to reflect on how remote work, technology, and digitalization affect well-being at work, social relations, and leadership. The project was most effective with regard to leadership, teams, renewal, and information flow. Development through technology was more difficult, and new dialogic interaction tools have been created. The pilots have learned the development method, and development has been able to continue by utilizing technology despite the pandemic.
#DIGITAL ARTIFACT MEANING PROFESSIONAL#
Both participant groups reported increased pressure at work, social isolation, professional loneliness, and improved work control and efficiency. Reports of neutral, negative, and positive experiences among two participant groups of the project-the implementers and pilot organizations-in remote work, devices and applications, and remote and technology-based development processes, were recorded.
The method was participatory action research using data collected from various assessments and a questionnaire. The theoretical framework of the project relied on the theories of dialogic development and leadership. This study aimed to analyze the challenges, learning experiences, and effects of the COVID-19 pandemic in a social, healthcare, and special education development project financed by the European Social Fund. As such, our contribution can help IS researchers, reviewers, and editors to extend and solidify their methodological repertoire. Based on this analysis, we synthesize six principles for dialectical inquiry that are firmly rooted in dialectical philosophy, evidenced in IS publications, clearly distinct from each other, and together comprehensive. In response, we present a critical analysis of general dialectics literature and 63 extant IS dialectical inquiry publications in 18 journals spanning three decades, revealing that there is a growing and sizeable community of IS researchers using dialectical inquiry explicitly or implicitly to examine how sociotechnical phenomena change. We also offer practical implications by illustrating the paradoxical effects of using digital innovation artefacts and suggesting appropriate coping strategies.Īlthough dialectical inquiry has been sporadically and selectively applied in the Information Systems (IS) discipline, and premier IS journals increasingly welcome dialectical inquiries, we lack methodological guidance on its application and evaluation, hindering its adoption as an important and valid IS research method. We discuss theoretical implications for research on affordances and outline a path for research on IT paradoxes. Via a dialectic synthesis of the three paradoxes and an extension to modelling tools, we develop a substantive theory of the paradoxical effects of digital artefacts on innovation practices. Analysing the usage of PowerPoint, as a dominant digital innovation artefact, we identify three paradoxes – conflicting yet interdependent tensions of digital artefacts in innovation practices: (1) Freedom and Captivity, (2) Clarity and Ambiguity, and (3) Scarcity and Abundance.
#DIGITAL ARTIFACT MEANING SOFTWARE#
In this paper, we study how digital artefacts enable and constrain innovation practices by means of an in-depth, multi-year qualitative field study at a software firm. Digital artefacts are increasingly used for supporting innovation practices, implying a growing need to better understand their role in different contexts.
0 kommentar(er)
